Be sure, our doctor is a true professional, the sexy patient will never leave disappointed. I don't know WHERE the game claimed it'd be realistic. I don't understand why everyone keeps complaining about it being unrealistic.It is not about the theory behind radiometric dating methods, it is about their , and it therefore assumes the reader has some familiarity with the technique already (refer to "Other Sources" for more information).As an example of how they are used, radiometric dates from geologically simple, fossiliferous Cretaceous rocks in western North America are compared to the geological time scale.Radiocarbon dating was the first chronometric technique widely available to archaeologists and was especially useful because it allowed researchers to directly date the panoply of organic remains often found in archaeological sites including artifacts made from bone, shell, wood, and other carbon based materials.In contrast to relative dating techniques whereby artifacts were simply designated as "older" or "younger" than other cultural remains based on the presence of fossils or stratigraphic position, 14C dating provided an easy and increasingly accessible way for archaeologists to construct chronologies of human behavior and examine temporal changes through time at a finer scale than what had previously been possible.
The Radiocarbon Revolution Since its development by Willard Libby in the 1940s, radiocarbon (14C) dating has become one of the most essential tools in archaeology.
Not to mention, with the boob sizes, NO ONE claimed it needed to be realistic sizes. On to the review, I didn't like some of the shit he called her, but obviously some people are into being talked down to, so I won't give you points off for that.
Some people, like myself, enjoy really large breasts. It's fun and it's not like anyone claims "OMG THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE REALISTIC" because it very clearly is not meant to be realistic..... I will, however, say that I can't help but laugh at the choppy and broken English sometimes, but again, I can only assume it's translation errors.
However, as with any dating technique there are limits to the kinds of things that can be satisfactorily dated, levels of precision and accuracy, age range constraints, and different levels of susceptibility to contamination.
Radiocarbon dating is especially good for determining the age of sites occupied within the last 26,000 years or so (but has the potential for sites over 50,000), can be used on carbon-based materials (organic or inorganic), and can be accurate to within ±30-50 years.